The Writing component gives 30 minutes for a single extended response. It is the shortest component and the one where the constraint is most obvious: there is not much time, and the piece has to be finished.
This is one of the four components of the selective school test.
Finishing beats polishing
An unfinished piece of excellent writing scores below a complete piece of good writing. That single fact should shape how a student prepares.
Thirty minutes has to cover reading the prompt, deciding on an approach, writing, and stopping in a controlled way. A student who spends ten minutes planning an ambitious piece and then runs out of time has done the hardest work and lost the marks for it.
Where the time goes
A workable split is about four minutes deciding and sketching a shape, twenty-two writing, and the last four finishing properly rather than proofreading. Those final minutes are better spent landing an ending than fixing spelling.
Students who practise this find the ending is what improves most. Under pressure, endings are the first thing to go, and a piece that simply stops reads as incomplete even when the length is fine.
The planning is not an essay plan. Three or four words is enough: who, what goes wrong, how it resolves for a narrative; position, two reasons, the strongest objection for a persuasive piece.
What a strong opening does
Both examples below are original, written for this page.
A weak opening for a prompt about an unexpected discovery:
It was a normal day like any other day. I woke up and had my breakfast and then I went outside to see what was happening. Little did I know that my whole life was about to change forever.
Nothing has happened yet, three sentences are gone, and the last line promises significance rather than delivering any. It is also a shape a marker sees constantly.
A stronger opening from the same prompt:
The letterbox had been empty for six weeks, which is why the envelope mattered. It had my name on it in handwriting I did not know, and the stamp was from a country I had never heard anyone in our family mention.
Same number of words. A situation, a specific detail and a question the reader now wants answered. No promise of importance, because the detail is doing that work.
The difference is not vocabulary. It is starting inside the situation rather than approaching it.
What markers can see
A clear shape: a response that knows what it is doing from the first line and gets somewhere by the last. Deliberate word choice rather than decoration. Sentences that vary because the meaning calls for it rather than because variety was on a checklist. Control of the ending.
What does not help: memorised passages inserted regardless of the prompt. They are visible, they usually fit poorly, and the time spent recalling them is time not spent responding to what was actually asked.
The mistakes that recur
Starting too far back. Waking up, getting dressed, walking to the place where the story begins. The prompt is the starting line, not the warm-up.
Running out of ending. The most common single fault, and the most fixable, because it is a time-management habit rather than a writing ability.
Describing instead of moving. Three sentences on the weather in a thirty-minute task is a large fraction of the piece spent standing still.
Answering a different prompt. A prepared story bent to fit. Markers notice, and the bending usually shows in the first paragraph.
How to practise it
Write to the clock, from a prompt not seen in advance, and stop when the time is up. Then read it back and ask two questions: did it finish, and does the shape hold. Those two are worth more than any amount of line-level editing.
One drill worth doing on its own: write openings only. Five prompts, four minutes each, first two sentences and nothing more. It is the highest-leverage part of the piece and it can be practised twenty times in the space of one full response.
A marking guide helps here more than in any other component, because writing is the one place where a parent cannot easily tell a strong response from a competent one. Knowing what the criteria reward turns a vague impression into something specific to work on.
The other components
Mathematical Reasoning · Reading · Thinking Skills · All four explained
Independent practice material. Not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the NSW Department of Education. All prompts, examples and marking guides are original material written by Better Tuition Academy.
Common questions
Frequently asked questions
- Is the genre announced in advance?
- Do not plan on it. Preparing for one genre and meeting another is a poor position to be in, and practising both narrative and persuasive responses removes the risk entirely.
- Should a student memorise a structure?
- A flexible shape helps; a memorised piece does not. The difference is whether it can bend to the prompt.
- How many practice pieces are useful?
- Fewer than people expect, if each one is marked against criteria and rewritten once. Many unmarked pieces mostly practise the habits already there.
- How long should the response be?
- Long enough to be complete. A finished shorter piece beats an abandoned longer one every time.
Right Tutor Guarantee
If the first tutor match isn't right and you tell us within your first three lessons, we keep tutoring free until it is.
This is in addition to your rights under the Australian Consumer Law.
Read our FAQsContact Us
Ready to get started, or have a question about tutoring?
Reach our team on 1800 002 085 (free to call) or send us an enquiry through our contact page.